MINT subjects need the most intelligence
STEM subjects: Geniuses are bad role models
The MINT subjects are becoming increasingly important in our society. Researchers have been racking their brains for a long time about how young people can best get excited about mathematics, computer science, natural sciences and technology. The right role models play an important role in this. Because when we see how others have managed to build a career in science, then we are also more inclined to take this path and trust ourselves to do the same.
However, not everyone who is successful is a shining example. This is indicated by a study published by a team led by Danfei Hu from Pennsylvania State University in the journal "Basic and Applied Social Psychology". In three experiments with between 150 and 300 test persons each, the scientists were able to show that people who had to work hard for their success evidently motivate us more than real geniuses.
This article is contained in Spectrum Psychology, 4/2020 (July / August)
Danfei Hu and her colleagues drew on two celebrities from science and research who are probably known to everyone: the inventor Thomas Edison, whose fame is often attributed to his persistence, and the physicist Albert Einstein, who is now known to many as The epitome of genius is true. In their first experiment, the researchers gave 176 subjects a story of the difficulties most scientists face during their careers. They explained to some of the test persons that it was an extract from the life of Edison; the rest of the participants should believe it was Einstein's career path.
Thomas Edison motivated, Albert Einstein demotivated
Those test subjects who assumed they had read about Albert Einstein were more likely to believe that in the end it was only his ingenuity that helped him succeed - the two stories were identical apart from the name of the protagonist. In addition, they were then less motivated to face a series of tricky math problems and managed them worse than the subjects in the Edison group.
In two further experiments with 162 and 288 participants respectively, the researchers varied the test procedure a little, but the result was always the same. For example, they tested the influence of the names Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison against the name of a fictitious and therefore completely unknown scientist whom they called "Mark Johnson". The authors came to the conclusion that a story about Thomas Edison apparently motivated their test subjects in comparison to a Mark Johnson story, while one about Albert Einstein deliberately demotivated them.
"According to our findings, it is more motivating to assume that someone's success involves effort than to hear about the predestined success story of a genius," Hu said in a university press release.
- Should I sell my stocks in Macys?
- How many programming languages are low
- What is Boris Johnson's democracy
- Is it Safe to Use Brite Cream?
- Why my ears get warmed up sometimes
- How do you understand classical conditioning
- What are aerospace engineers
- What is cold start apprenticeship 2
- How do I meet billionaires
- What is the best editor IDE for PHP
- Who commissioned Mozart's last Requiem?
- How much money does SpaceX get
- What is it like to study Islamic economics
- Has Jimmy Wales ever attended Quora
- Plans Quora to expand in Spanish
- What is the algebraic closure of Q.
- Killing dolphins
- Are there vegan eaters in Pakistan?
- How safe is Delaware
- Which picture sums up Pakistan in a nutshell?
- Where can I buy garage door struts
- What is the future of daemonization
- What is the lightest and most powerful weapon
- Is MATLAB necessary for electrical engineers